top of page

Exploring Criminal Procedural Systems: Accusatorial, Inquisitorial, and Mixed


In the study of criminal procedural systems, three fundamental systems have evolved throughout history: the accusatorial, the inquisitorial, and the mixed system, each appearing in chronological order. Understanding these systems is essential in grasping the foundations of criminal justice.



1. The Accusatorial System:

Originating from a private conception of criminal law, the accusatorial system is the earliest of the three. In its most advanced form, key characteristics include:


👉 Judge's Passivity: The judge does not initiate proceedings but responds to accusations brought forward.

👉 Accuser's Role: The accusation defines the scope of the process, both in terms of individuals involved and the alleged acts.

👉 Correlation Requirement: The judge's verdict must align with the accusations, preventing convictions of different individuals or for different actions.

👉 Oral and Public Proceedings: The process unfolds through oral presentations and public scrutiny.

👉 Jury Decision: Verdicts are rendered by jurors representing the community, free from hierarchical influences.



2. The Inquisitorial System:

Rooted in Canon law during the Middle Ages, the inquisitorial system introduced significant changes. Key characteristics include:


👉 State-Led Investigations: The state takes the initiative, combining the roles of accuser and judge, establishing permanent bodies for crime investigation.

👉 Specialized Judiciary: The judiciary's function becomes specialized, with distinct roles for investigation and adjudication.

👉 Judicial Discretion: The judge has the authority to determine both the scope of the accusation and the verdict.

👉 Written and Confidential: Proceedings are conducted in writing and kept confidential, with appeals and legal evidence acting as checks on judicial power.

👉 Limited Party Involvement: Genuine parties may not exist, with an emphasis on the judge's role.



3. The Mixed System:

The mixed system combines elements from both the accusatorial and inquisitorial systems, resulting in a more balanced approach to criminal proceedings. Key features include:


👉 Dual Roles: The State, through the Public Prosecutor's Office, retains a role in prosecution, ensuring a fair process.

👉 Specialized Investigation: While the judiciary retains control over adjudication, investigation remains specialized.

👉 Accusation's Influence: The scope of the accusation remains crucial, but the judge ensures a fair and balanced process.

👉 Oral and Public Hearings: Proceedings are conducted orally, publicly, and in a confrontational manner.

👉 Immediacy and Concentration: The principles of immediacy and concentration guide the trial, enhancing efficiency.




Understanding these systems helps clarify the foundations of criminal justice. While each system has its merits and limitations, the evolution of these approaches has contributed to the development of more equitable and effective legal systems worldwide.

32 views0 comments

Comments


bottom of page